金沙娱乐场官方网-澳门金沙会官网-金沙集团股价实情信息最新

首頁(yè)» 往期文章» 2017» Issue 3» 石油經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理

Petroleum Science >2017,??Issue 3:??622-635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-017-0175-0

Selecting China’s strategic petroleum reserve sites by multi-objective programming model Open?Access

文章信息

pdf下載
作者：Hui Li, Ren-Jin Sun, Kang-Yin Dong, Xiu-Cheng Dong, Zhong-Bin Zhou and Xia Leng
作者單位：

School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China; Energy Systems Research Center, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA,School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China,School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China; Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA,School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China,School of Management, Yangtze University, Hubei 434023, China and Sinopec Offshore Oilfield Services Company, Shanghai 200000, China

投稿時(shí)間：2016-11-08
引用方式：Li, H., Sun, RJ., Dong, KY. et al. Pet. Sci. (2017) 14: 622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-017-0175-0

文章摘要

An important decision for policy makers is selecting strategic petroleum reserve sites. However, policy makers may not choose the most suitable and efficient locations for strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) due to the complexity in the choice of sites. This paper proposes a multi-objective programming model to determine the optimal locations for China’s SPR storage sites. This model considers not only the minimum response time but also the minimum transportation cost based on a series of reasonable assumptions and constraint conditions. The factors influencing SPR sites are identified to determine potential demand points and candidate storage sites. Estimation and suggestions are made for the selection of China’s future SPR storage sites based on the results of this model. When the number of petroleum storage sites is less than or equals 25 and the maximum capacity of storage sites is restricted to 10 million tonnes, the model’s result best fit for the current layout scheme selected thirteen storage sites in four scenarios. Considering the current status of SPR in China, Tianjin, Qingdao, Dalian, Daqing and Zhanjiang, Chengdu, Xi’an, and Yueyang are suggested to be the candidate locations for the third phase of the construction plan. The locations of petroleum storage sites suggested in this work could be used as a reference for decision makers.

關(guān)鍵詞

    Strategic petroleum reserve, Storage site selection, Multi-objective modeling, China